A fungal prion is a prion that infects hosts which are fungi. Fungal prions are naturally occurring that can switch between multiple, structurally distinct conformations, at least one of which is self-propagating and transmissible to other prions. This transmission of protein state represents an epigenetic phenomenon where information is encoded in the protein structure itself, instead of in nucleic acids. Several prion-forming proteins have been identified in fungi, primarily in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These fungal prions are generally considered benign, and in some cases even confer a selectable advantage to the organism.
Fungal prions have provided a model for the understanding of disease-forming prions. Study of fungal prions has led to a characterisation of the sequence features and mechanisms that enable prion domains to switch between functional and amyloid-forming states.
A recent study of candidate prion domains in S. cerevisiae found several specific sequence features that were common to proteins showing aggregation and self-templating properties. For example, proteins that aggregated had candidate prion domains that were more highly enriched in asparagine, while non-aggregating domains where more highly enriched in glutamine and charged peptides. There was also evidence that the spacing of charged peptides that prevent amyloid formation, such as proline, is important in prionogenesis. This discovery of sequence specificity was a departure from previous work that had suggested that the only determining factor in prionogenesis was the overall distribution of peptides.
Despite many years of effort, Cox could not identify a conventional mutation that was responsible for the PSI+ trait. In 1994, yeast geneticist Reed Wickner correctly hypothesized that PSI+ as well as another mysterious heritable trait, URE3, resulted from prion forms of the normal , Sup35p and Ure2p, respectively. The names of yeast prions are frequently placed within brackets to indicate that they are non-mendelian in their passage to progeny cells, much like plasmid and mitochondrial DNA.
Further investigation found that PSI+ is the result of a self-propagating misfolded form of Sup35p (a 201 amino acid long protein), which is an important factor for translation termination during protein synthesis. In PSI+ yeast cells the Sup35 protein forms filamentous aggregates known as amyloid. The amyloid conformation is self-propagating and represents the prion state. Amazingly distinct prion states exist for the Sup35 protein with distinct properties and these distinctions are self-propagating. Other prions also can form distinct different variants (or strains). It is believed that suppression of nonsense mutations in PSI+ cells is due to a reduced amount of functional Sup35 because much of the protein is in the amyloid state. The Sup35 protein assembles into amyloid via an amino-terminal prion domain. The structure is based on the stacking of the prion domains in an in-register and parallel beta sheet conformation.
An important finding by Chernoff, in a collaboration between the Liebman and Lindquist laboratories, was that a protein chaperone was required for PSI+ to be maintained. Because the only function of chaperones is to help proteins fold properly, this finding strongly supported Wickner's hypothesis that PSI+ was a heritable protein state (i.e. a prion). Likewise, this finding also provided evidence for the general hypothesis that prions, including the originally proposed mammalian PRNP prion, are heritable forms of protein. Because of the action of chaperones, especially Hsp104, proteins that code for PSI+ and URE3 can convert from non-prion to prion forms. For this reason, yeast prions are good models for studying factors like chaperones that affect protein aggregation. Also, the IPOD is the sub-cellular site to which amyloidogenic proteins are sequestered in yeast, and where prions like PSI+ may undergo maturation. Thus, prions also serve as substrates to understand the intracellular processing of protein aggregates such as amyloid.
Laboratories commonly identify PSI+ by growth of a strain auxotrophic for adenine on media lacking adenine, similar to that used by Cox et al. These strains cannot synthesize adenine due to a nonsense mutation in one of the enzymes involved in the biosynthetic pathway. When the strain is grown on yeast-extract/dextrose/peptone media (YPD), the blocked pathway results in buildup of a red-colored intermediate compound, which is exported from the cell due to its toxicity. Hence, color is an alternative method of identifying PSI+ -- PSI+ strains are white or pinkish in color, and psi- strains are red. A third method of identifying PSI+ is by the presence of Sup35 in the pelleted fraction of cellular lysate.
When exposed to certain adverse conditions, in some genetic backgrounds PSI+ cells actually fare better than their prion-free siblings; this finding suggests that the ability to adopt a PSI+ prion form may result from positive evolutionary selection. It has been speculated that the ability to convert between prion-infected and prion-free forms acts as an evolutionary capacitor to enable yeast to quickly and reversibly adapt in variable environments. Nevertheless, Reed Wickner maintains that URE3 and PSI+ are diseases, although this claim has been challenged using theoretical population genetic models.
A non-prion function of Rnq1 has not been definitively characterized. Though reasons for this are poorly understood, it is suggested that PIN+ aggregates may act as "seeds" for the polymerization of PSI+ and other prions. The basis of the PIN+ prion is an amyloid form of Rnq1 arranged in in-register parallel beta sheets, like the amyloid form of Sup35. Due to similar amyloid structures, the PIN+ prion may facilitate the formation of PSI+ through a templating mechanism.
Two modified versions of Sup35 have been created that can induce PSI+ in the absence of PIN+ when overexpressed. One version was created by digestion of the gene with the restriction enzyme Bal2, which results in a protein consisting of only the M and N portions of Sup35. The other is a fusion of Sup35NM with HPR, a human membrane receptor protein.
Ure2 | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Nitrogen catabolite repressor | URE3 | Growth on poor nitrogen sources | 1994 |
Sup35 | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Translation termination factor | PSI+ | Increased levels of nonsense suppression | 1994 |
HET-S | Podospora anserina | Regulates heterokaryon incompatibility | Het-s | Heterokaryon formation between incompatible strains | 1997 |
vacuolar protease B | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | death in stationary phase, failure in meiosis | β | failure to degrade cellular proteins under N starvation | 2003 |
MAP kinases | Podospora anserina | increased pigment, slow growth | C | 2006 | |
Rnq1p | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Protein template factor | RNQ+, PIN+ | Promotes aggregation of other prions | 2000 |
Mca1* | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Putative Yeast Caspase | MCA+ | Unknown | 2008 |
Swi1 | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Chromatin remodeling | SWI+ | Poor growth on some carbon sources | 2008 |
Cyc8 | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Transcriptional repressor | OCT+ | Transcriptional derepression of multiple genes | 2009 |
Mot3 | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Nuclear transcription factor | MOT3+ | Transcriptional derepression of anaerobic genes | 2009 |
Pma1+Std1 | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Pma1 = major plasma membrane proton pump, Std1=minor pump | GAR+ | Resistant to glucose-associated repression | 2009 |
Sfp1 | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Global transcriptional regulator | ISP+ | Antisuppressor of certain sup35 mutations | 2010 |
Mod5 | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | MOD+ | 2012 |
|
|